Triple-positive Breast Cancer Research Articles

Abstract PO1-14-03: Discovery of proliferation essential gene signature and ACTL6A as potential biomarker for predicting prognosis and neoadjuvant therapy response in triple-positive breast cancer

Abstract Background: Based on the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a special subtype of breast cancer which expresses all three receptors can be distinguished, namely triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC). TPBC patients has a higher risk of recurrence and lower survival rate compared to other luminal breast cancers. However, there are few studies on predicting molecules of prognosis and treatment response for TPBC. Methods: Proliferation essential genes (PEGs) were identified using CRISPR-Cas9 dataset of DepMap. The expression profiles and clinical data of TPBC were obtained from the TCGA database, GEO datasets and our center cohort. To develop a TPBC-PEG prognostic signature, cox regression and Lasso (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression analysis were applied. Functional analysis was performed using Gene Set Enrichment analysis. Finally, the relationship between candidate genes and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) sensitivity was explored using real-time qPCR (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) based on clinical samples. Results: Among 900 TPBC-PEGs, 437 genes showed significant differential expression between TPBC and normal tissues. Subsequently, we identified 3 prognostic PEGs (ACTL6A, CCT2, TARS) and used them to construct a PEG signature. Patients with high PEG signature scores exhibited worse overall survival and lower sensitivity to NAT compared to those with low PEG signature scores. RT-qPCR indicated that in patients who lacked sensitivity to NAT, ACTL6A and CCT2 were significantly upregulated. The IHC results showed that ACTL6A protein was highly expressed in the NAT-insensitive group and non-pathological complete response patients. Conclusion: In this study, we developed an efficient PEG prognostic model that can predict the outcome for TPBC. Furthermore, we found that the expression of ACTL6A is associated with neoadjuvant therapy sensitivity in TPBC patients and can serve as an important factor in predicting patient prognosis and drug sensitivity. Figure 3. Construction and validation of a PEG signature for TPBC patients. Figure 6. The predictive value of ACTL6A on NAT efficacy and its correlation with clinical characteristics. Citation Format: Xiaofen Li, Wenfen Fu, Shiping Luo, Jie Zhang, Qingshui Wang, Chuangui Song. Discovery of proliferation essential gene signature and ACTL6A as potential biomarker for predicting prognosis and neoadjuvant therapy response in triple-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-14-03.

Abstract RF02-01: A Multicenter, Phase I/II Trial of Anastrozole, Palbociclib, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab in Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive, HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (ASPIRE)

Abstract Background: Among patients (pts) with HR-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer, crosstalk between HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling pathways may contribute to endocrine resistance but anti-HER2 agents in combination with endocrine therapy can restore endocrine sensitivity. Mechanistically, HER2/HER3 signaling promotes survival by way of PI3K-AKT activation whereas ER-CDK4/6-Rb signaling promotes cell cycle progression. The combination of anti-HER2 therapy with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) and a CDK 4/6 inhibitor would allow for blockade of both pathways and provide a novel, all biologic, and chemotherapy-free approach to the treatment of HR-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: We conducted a phase I/II multi-institution trial in pts with previously untreated, HR-positive and HER2-positive MBC. In the Phase I portion, pts received escalating doses of palbociclib (100mg, 125mg) in conjunction with trastuzumab, pertuzumab and an AI anastrozole, using a 3+3 dose escalation trial design. In the phase II portion, pts received palbociclib at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), anastrozole, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab. The primary endpoints of the Phase I and II portions were MTD and clinical benefit rate (CBR) defined as the sum of complete response, partial response, and stable disease for >/= 6 months, respectively. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. The Phase II portion of this study was powered with 30 pts to show efficacy of palbociclib administered at the MTD in combination with anastrozole, trastuzumab and pertuzumab if the CBR achieved at 6 months exceeded 58%. The Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate confidence intervals for ORR and CBR. The PFS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In the Phase I portion, a total of 9 pts were enrolled. No DLTs were observed at the 100mg dose (N=3) or the 125mg dose (N=6) level, and thus, 125mg was established as the MTD. An additional 24 pts were enrolled to the Phase II portion at the MTD, with a total of 30 pts in the modified intention-to-treat population included in the efficacy analysis. The median age of the population was 57.6 years (range 50.5-63.8) and 27% of pts were premenopausal and received ovarian function suppression as part of treatment. As shown in Table 1, the primary endpoint, CBR, was 97% (95% CI: 0.83-1.0, p<0.0001). ORR was 70% (95% CI: 0.51-0.85). Median time to objective response was 2.8 months with earliest response at 3 months. Median duration of response was not reached with range of 5.1-42.2 months. Median PFS was also not reached with range of 8-44.8 months. Safety data were consistent with known toxicity profiles of agents. Most common adverse events included diarrhea (80%), neutropenia (77%), leukopenia (70%), anemia (67%), and fatigue (60%). Grade 3-4 events occurred in 63% (19/30) of pts and included neutropenia (68%), leukopenia (32%), decrease in absolute neutrophil count (21%), and anemia (21%). Conclusions: The combination of anastrozole, palbociclib, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab was well tolerated and effective with a clinical benefit rate of 97% in pts with previously untreated HR-positive, HER2-positive MBC. The combination provides a chemotherapy-free alternative for pts with triple positive breast cancers. Further follow up will determine impact on PFS. Table 1. Results in Patients on Anastrozole, Palbociclib, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab Citation Format: Rima Patel, Krystal Cascetta, Paula Klein, Erin Moshier, Maryann Kwa, Julie Fasano, Anupama Goel, Melissa Accordino, Charles Shapiro, Rita Vaccaro, Gargi Atul Joshi, Joseph Sparano, Amy Tiersten. A Multicenter, Phase I/II Trial of Anastrozole, Palbociclib, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab in Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive, HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (ASPIRE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr RF02-01.

Distinct ER and PR expression patterns significantly affect the clinical outcomes of early HER2-positive breast cancer: A real-world analysis of 871 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy

IntroductionThe impact of distinct estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression patterns on tumor behavior and treatment outcomes within HER2-positive breast cancer is not fully explored. This study aimed to comprehensively examine the clinical differences among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer harboring distinct ER and PR expression patterns in the neoadjuvant setting. MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 871 HER2-positive breast patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy at our hospital between 2011 and 2022. Comparisons were performed across the three hormone receptor (HR)-specific subtypes, namely the ER-negative/PR-negative/HER2-positive (ER-/PR-/HER2+), the single HR-positive (HR+)/HER2+, and the triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) subtypes. ResultsOf 871 patients, 21.0% had ER-/PR-/HER2+ tumors, 33.6% had single HR+/HER2+ disease, and 45.4% had TPBC. Individuals with single HR+/HER2+ tumors and TPBC cases demonstrated significantly lower pathological complete response (pCR) rates compared to those with ER-/PR-/HER2+ tumors (36.9% vs. 24.3% vs. 49.2%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed TPBC as significantly associated with decreased pCR likelihood (OR = 0.42, 95%CI 0.28–0.63, p < 0.001). Survival outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), showed no significant differences across HR-specific subtypes in the overall patient population. However, within patients without anti-HER2 therapy, TPBC was linked to improved DFS and a trend towards better OS. ConclusionsHER2-positive breast cancer exhibited three distinct HR-specific subtypes with varying clinical manifestations and treatment responses. These findings suggest personalized treatment strategies considering ER and PR expression patterns, emphasizing the need for further investigations to unravel molecular traits underlying HER2-positive breast cancer with distinct HR expression patterns.

Abstract 4883: NFE2L3 regulates the expression of BHLHE40 in triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract Introduction: Breast Cancer (BrCA) is one of the most common cancers, causing mortality in women worldwide. Among the subtypes of breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive due to the absence of three major receptors: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2). Treatment options for TNBC are limited because of the lack of these molecular targets. We hypothesized that the identification and characterization of novel transcriptional regulatory relationships in TNBC will provide etiologic insights, enhance therapeutic outcomes, and improve patient survival. Overexpression of NFE2L3 in BrCA has inhibited cell proliferation and metastasis while overexpression of BHLHE40 has produced an inverse effect. This study aims to characterize the relationship between NFE2L3 and BHLHE40 in TNBC cells. Methods: Patient data from the two groups of our focus from the Cancer Genome Atlas BrCA RNAseq gene expression dataset were examined: triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) and TNBC. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between these groups were identified using DESeq2. Pathways over-represented among the DEGs were determined using enrichR. For their impact on biological interactions, those DEGs were mapped to curate protein-protein interactions - the STRING database. Additionally, DEGs were superposed on two network inference algorithm-generated transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs). Virtual Inference of protein activity by Enriched Regulon analysis was applied to the generated TRN to identify master regulators driving gene expression differences between TPBC and TNBC. Of the master regulators observed, the activity of NFE2L3 was explored in TNBC cells. The TRNs indicate that NFE2L3 regulates the expression of BHLHE40. This regulatory relationship was explored in TNBC cells by RNA interference, qRT-PCR, immunoblotting, and co-immunoprecipitation assays to investigate NFE2L3 and BHLHE40 gene and protein expression and interaction. Results: Among 12,000 DEGs (5% FDR), over-represented pathways included “mitotic signaling” and “G1/S transition”. Master regulators with higher expression in TNBC included NFE2L3, HMGA1, TP53, FOXC1, and SOX9; those with lower expression included FOXA1, BHLHE40, AR, XBP1, and ESR1. On silencing the cells of NFE2L3 and performing qRTPCR analysis, the expression of BHLHE40 was decreased in the TNBC cells. The protein-protein interaction between NFE2L3 and BHLHE40 was also validated. Conclusion: DEGs up-regulated in TNBC participate in cell cycle signaling. And there is a novel transcriptional regulatory relationship between NFE2L3 and BHLHE40 in TNBC cells. Citation Format: Shail Rakesh Modi, Terrick Andey, George Acquaah-Mensah. NFE2L3 regulates the expression of BHLHE40 in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4883.

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) impairs hypoxia-induced cellular and exosomal overexpression of immune-checkpoints and immunomodulatory molecules in different subtypes of breast cancer cells

BackgroundTumor cells express immune-checkpoint molecules to suppress anti-tumor immune responses. In part, immune evasion takes place by secreting exosomes bearing immune-checkpoint and immunomodulatory molecules and their inducing and/or regulating agents e.g., microRNAs (miRs). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of omega-3 fatty acid, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), on the expression of some selected immune-checkpoint and immunomodulatory molecules and their regulating miRs under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions in triple negative (TNBC) invasive and triple positive non-invasive breast cancer cell lines.MethodsMDA-MB-231 and BT-474 cells were treated with 100 µM DHA under hypoxic and normoxic conditions for 24 h. Exosomes were isolated by ultracentrifuge and confirmed by electron microscope and anti-CD9, -CD63, -CD81 immunoblotting. Total RNA from cells and exosomes were extracted and expression of CD39, CD73, CD47, CD80, PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 genes and their related miRs were evaluated by quantitative Real-time PCR.ResultsThis study showed significant over-expression of immune-checkpoint and immunomodulatory molecules under hypoxic condition. Treatment with DHA resulted in a significant decrease in immune-checkpoint and immunomodulatory molecule expression as well as an upregulation of their regulatory miRNA expression.ConclusionDHA supplementation may be utilized in breast cancer therapy for down-regulation of cellular and exosomal immune escape-related molecules.

A pilot trial of neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus trastuzumab, dalpiciclib, and letrozole for triple-positive breast cancer.

Triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) poorly responds to current standard neoadjuvant therapy (trastuzumab plus pertuzumab and chemotherapy). Our previous MUKDEN 01 study showed a promising total pathological complete response (tpCR) rate of 30.4% with neoadjuvant pyrotinib (pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus dalpiciclib (cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) and letrozole, but the efficacy remains suboptimal. This pilot study (NCT05228951) explored adding trastuzumab to this triplet neoadjuvant regimen in patients with stage II-III TPBC. The primary endpoint was tpCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) rate. Between February 2022 and June 2022, 12 patients were enrolled, and seven (58%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7%-84.8%) patients achieved tpCR. The rate of residual cancer burden (RCB) 0-I was 75% (95% CI, 46.8%-91.1%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 92% (95% CI, 64.6%-98.5%). Mean Ki-67 level was significantly reduced from 45.0% (95% CI, 19.5%-70.5%) at baseline to 17.2% (95% CI, 0.7%-33.7%) after neoadjuvant therapy (p=0.03). The most common grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (four [33%]) and decreased neutrophil count (three [25%]). No grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. This four-drug neoadjuvant regimen shows promising pathological response with an acceptable safety profile in patients with TPBC. A randomized controlled trial (NCT05638594) of this regimen is being conducted.

Analysis of TLR2 in Primary Endocrine Resistant of Breast Cancer.

Previous clinical studies have suggested that Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 had predictive function for endocrine resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer (BCa). Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether TLR2 would relate to development of endocrine therapy resistance in triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC). Bioinformatic analysis of TLR2 was carried out through a database. Ten tumor tissues were obtained from TPBC patients who underwent surgery, with five patients displaying primary resistance to tamoxifen (TAM) with the remaining 5 being sensitive. Different levels of proteins were identified through mass spectrometry analysis and confirmed through reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blot. TAM-resistant cell lines (BT474-TAM) were established by continuous exposure to TAM, and TAM resistance was assessed via IC50. Additionally, TLR2 mRNA was analyzed through western blot and RT-PCR in BT474, BT474-TAM, MCF-7, and MCF10A cells. Furthermore, TLR2-specific interference sequences were utilized to downregulate TLR2 expression in BT474-TAM cells to elucidate its role in TAM resistance. TLR2 had a correlation with decreased relapse-free survival in BCa patients from the GSE1456-GPL96 cohort, and it was involved in cancer development predominantly mediated by MAPK and PI3K pathways. TLR2 protein expression ranked in the top 5 proteins within the TAM-resistant group, and was 1.9 times greater than that in the sensitive group. Additionally, TLR2 mRNA and protein expression increased significantly in the established TAM-resistant BT474/TAM cell lines. The sensitivity of TAM was restored upon TLR2 downregulation in BT474/TAM cells. TLR2 might have a therapeutic value as it was involved in the TAM resistance in TPBC, with potential to be a marker for primary endocrine resistance.

Discovery of a proliferation essential gene signature and actin-like 6A as potential biomarkers for predicting prognosis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in triple-positive breast cancer.

Patients with triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) have a higher risk of recurrence and lower survival rates than patients with other luminal breast cancers. However, there are few studies on the predictive biomarkers of prognosis and treatment responses in TPBC. Proliferation essential genes (PEGs) were acquired from clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) technology, and cohorts of patients with TPBC were obtained from public databases and our cohort. To develop a TPBC-PEG signature, Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analyses were applied. Functional analyses were performed with gene set enrichment analysis. The relationship between candidate genes and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) sensitivity was explored via real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on the basis of clinical samples. Among 900 TPBC-PEGs, 437 showed significant differential expression between TPBC and normal tissues. Three prognostic PEGs (actin-like 6A [ACTL6A], chaperonin containing TCP1 subunit 2 [CCT2], and threonyl-TRNA synthetase [TARS]) were identified and used to construct the PEG signature. Patients with high PEG signature scores exhibited a worse overall survival and lower sensitivity to NACT than patients with low PEG signature scores. RT-qPCR results indicated that ACTL6A and CCT2 expression were significantly upregulated in patients who lacked sensitivity to NACT. IHC results showed that the ACTL6A protein was highly expressed in patients with NACT resistance and nonpathological complete responses. This efficient PEG signature prognostic model can predict the outcomes of TPBC. Furthermore, ACTL6A expression level was associated with the response to NACT, and could serve as an important factor in predicting prognosis and drug sensitivity of patients with TPBC.

Conus Medullaris Metastasis in a Patient with Triple-positive Breast Cancer

Conus Medullaris Metastasis in a Patient with Triple-positive Breast Cancer

Oxaliplatin and Checkpoint Inhibitor Induces Immunogenic Cells Death and Promotes Therapeutic Efficacy in the Model of Murine Triple Positive Breast Cancer.

Various damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) associated with immunogenic cell death (ICD) have been discovered, potentially leading to cancer cell elimination. Certain platinum-based compounds can trigger both cancer cell apoptosis and ICD. This study aims to investigate the effect of the therapy of anti- PDL1 with Oxaliplatin by increasing amount and increasing treatment duration of anti-PDL1 with Oxaliplatin in SK-Br-3, both in vitro and in vivo conditions. The study will use HER-2 (3+) breast cancer cell line, SKBr3. The cells will be treated with increasing concentrations of Oxaliplatin with anti-PDL1 for different durations. In vitro death of cancer cells will be measured by MTT assay, HMGB1 will be measured by western blot. Additionally, ATP release will be measured, mice will be injected with SK-Br-3 and treated with the combo therapy of anti-PDL1 with Oxaliplatin, and in vivo tumor growth will be recorded weekly for xenograft. The positive control for the experiments is cisplatin, and the negative control is IgG solution instead of aPDL1 and Oxaliplatin in PBS.There are three main possible results: (1) The combo therapy of Oxaliplatin with anti-PDL1 induces robust ICD in HER-2 triple positive breast cancer cells. (2) The combo therapy of Oxaliplatin with anti-PDL1 act as a stimulant for robust ICD in HER-2(3+) positive breast cancer cells. (3) The combo-therapy of Oxaliplatin with anti-PDL1 has no significant effect on inducing robust ICD in HER-2(3+) positive breast cancer cells. The result of the study will provide important insight into the preclinical effectiveness of Oxaliplatin with anti-PDL1 in treating HER-2 (3+) breast cancer, and it also sets the basis for future clinical studies of the drug. Future studies should focus on investigating the mechanism underlying Oxaliplatin with anti-PDL1 effectiveness in SK-Br-3.

The Role of the Tumor Microenvironment in Triple-Positive Breast Cancer Progression and Therapeutic Resistance.

Breast cancer (BRCA) is a highly heterogeneous systemic disease. It is ranked first globally in the incidence of new cancer cases and has emerged as the primary cause of cancer-related death among females. Among the distinct subtypes of BRCA, triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) has been associated with increased metastasis and invasiveness, exhibiting greater resistance to endocrine therapy involving trastuzumab. It is now understood that invasion, metastasis, and treatment resistance associated with BRCA progression are not exclusively due to breast tumor cells but are from the intricate interplay between BRCA and its tumor microenvironment (TME). Accordingly, understanding the pathogenesis and evolution of the TPBC microenvironment demands a comprehensive approach. Moreover, addressing BRCA treatment necessitates a holistic consideration of the TME, bearing significant implications for identifying novel targets for anticancer interventions. This review expounds on the relationship between critical cellular components and factors in the TPBC microenvironment and the inception, advancement, and therapeutic resistance of breast cancer to provide perspectives on the latest research on TPBC.

Advances in Doxorubicin-based nano-drug delivery system in triple negative breast cancer.

Triple positive breast cancer (TPBC) is one of the most aggressive breast cancer. Due to the unique cell phenotype, aggressiveness, metastatic potential and lack of receptors or targets, chemotherapy is the choice of treatment for TNBC. Doxorubicin (DOX), one of the representative agents of anthracycline chemotherapy, has better efficacy in patients with metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). DOX in anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens have higher response rates. Nano-drug delivery systems possess unique targeting and ability of co-load, deliver and release chemotherapeutic drugs, active gene fragments and immune enhancing factors to effectively inhibit or kill tumor cells. Therefore, advances in nano-drug delivery systems for DOX therapy have attracted a considerable amount of attention from researchers. In this article, we have reviewed the progress of nano-drug delivery systems (e.g., Nanoparticles, Liposomes, Micelles, Nanogels, Dendrimers, Exosomes, etc.) applied to DOX in the treatment of TNBC. We also summarize the current progress of clinical trials of DOX combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIS) for the treatment of TNBC. The merits, demerits and future development of nanomedicine delivery systems in the treatment of TNBC are also envisioned, with the aim of providing a new class of safe and efficient thoughts for the treatment of TNBC.

Non-invasive Assessment of Pathological Complete Response and Minimal Residual Disease Through Plasma Methylomics in Patients With Triple Positive Breast Cancer

Non-invasive Assessment of Pathological Complete Response and Minimal Residual Disease Through Plasma Methylomics in Patients With Triple Positive Breast Cancer

S3825 Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia in a Patient Treated for Triple Positive Breast Cancer

S3825 Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia in a Patient Treated for Triple Positive Breast Cancer

Clinicopathological and prognostic value of TIL and PD L1 in triple negative breast carcinomas

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), a highly aggressive subtype of breast cancer, accounts for 15 % of all diagnosed breast cancers. This group, which has the worst clinical outcome, high recurrence rate and poor prognosis, does not benefit from specific treatment. Therefore, there is a need to develop more effective biomarker and therapeutic strategies especially for this group. A positive level of immunity has been found to be associated with patient survival in various organ cancers. More specifically, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) have been documented to have strong prognostic value. The programmed cell death 1 (PD 1) protein on the surface of T lymphocytes is activated by the Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein on the cancer cell surface. PD- L1 is thought to form a pathway that results in suppression of antitumor responses when activated. Patients with breast cancer (BC) who underwent resection without neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2010 and 2020 were included in this study. Of the 302 BCs examined, 21 constitute the group with TNBC. In our study, the mean age of the Triple positive breast cancer (TPBC) and TNBC groups was similar (55.67 ± 12.61 vs. 53.23 ± 8.21, p = 0.384). There was no significant correlation between TPBC and TNBC and tumor size, lymph node, histological grade, and PD-L1 positivity in the center of the tumor (all p-value >.05). It was observed that tumor stage was higher in patients with TNBC than in patients with TPBC (19 % vs. 1.1 %, p = .002). The Ki 67 proliferation index was found to be higher in patients with TNBC than in patients with TPBC (90.5 % vs. 41.8 %, p .001). Although not statistically significant, clinically, CD 3 and CD 8 immune scores with high tumor margin were higher in patients with TNBC than in patients with TPBC (90.4 % vs, 9.6 % and 85.7 % vs. 14.3 %, respectively). Positive expression of PD-L1 at the tumor margin was significantly higher in patients with TNBC than patients with TPBC (20.3 % vs, 52.4 %, p = .002). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the survival distribution of CD 3 and CD 8 immunoscore, tumor central and margin PD-L1 values were compared. Mean follow-up was 136.18 months (range, 1 – 144 months); and the 10-year Overall Survival (OS) estimate for the population was 90.9 % (95 % CI, 85.5 – 96.7). In this study, this difference was not statistically significant according to the log-rank test. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between CD 3, CD 8 T lymphocyte immune score and PD-L1 expression at the tumor center and margin in TNBC, the prognostic value and clinicopathological significance of this relationship.

Histopathological Patterns and Outcomes of Triple-Positive Versus Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Background One of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in females under 45 years old is breast cancer (BC). The definition of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the lack of expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) as well as progesterone receptors (PRs) and Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2) gene amplification. Triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC), on the other hand, is defined as tumors expressing a high level of ER, PR, and HER2 receptors. This study aims to assess the phenotypes of TNBC and TPBC by comparing their individual clinical behavior patterns and prognosis throughout the course of the disease in a tertiary cancer center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods Our study is a retrospective study using electronic medical records (EMRs) to identify all female patients diagnosed with BCusing the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) codes (between C50 and C50.9). About 1209 cases with primary BC female patients were recognized based on histopathology reports. Further subclassification into TPBC and TNBC was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using Rv3.6.2 (R Studio, version 3.5.2, Boston, MA, USA). The descriptive data were presented as means and standard deviations (SD).Survival curves were approximated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The comparison between survival curves between both groups was achieved using the log-rank test. The multivariate model was constructed based on the identified predictors using univariate analysis. Results Univariate analysis of overall survival (OS) showed that mortality was higher in TNBC compared to TPBC (HR = 2.82, P-value <0.05). However, in a multivariate analysis, molecular subtypes did not show a significant effect on OS with a P-value of 0.94. We found that age at diagnosis has been associated with a 4% increase in mortality risk with a yearly rise in age. Conclusion In this limited retrospective cohort study, we found that TNBC may not be associated with a higher risk of death than TPBC. However, other factors, including age at diagnosis, surgical intervention, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), have been observed to increase the risk of mortality. On the other hand, patients with TNBC were found to have a worse prognosis in terms of local recurrence.This information cannot be generalized to all patients with BC given the limitations of this study. Further, larger cohorts are needed to explore biological and treatment-related outcomes in patients with TNBC and TPBC.

Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Is There an Optimal Sequence of Therapy?

Approximately 20% of breast cancers overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+), conferring a particularly aggressive subtype of the disease with an increased risk for the development of systemic and brain metastases. However, the advent of trastuzumab and more recently several other HER2-targeting novel therapies has led to significant improvements in the prognosis, making the diagnosis a "double-edged sword." The current standard first-line therapy for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a taxane combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Trastuzumab deruxtecan should be used preferentially in the second line, with the only caveat being patients with CNS involvement where the tucatinib, capecitabine, and trastuzumab regimen could be considered. In the third line setting, given the survival benefits demonstrated with the tucatinib regimen in patients with and without CNS metastases, this is the preferred strategy. In the fourth line and beyond, there is no clear standard. Options include margetuximab in combination with chemotherapy, neratinib + capecitabine, or trastuzumab + chemotherapy. There are several novel therapies under investigation reporting promising results in the late-line setting. The treatment landscape of HER2-positive advanced disease is evolving constantly, with several active therapies being moved to the early-stage setting. Accordingly, it will be critical to identify biomarkers and mechanisms of resistance to optimize therapy selection and maximize patient outcomes and quality of life. Here, we provide an overview of the current and future management of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer and address the specific scenarios which may impact treatment selection including triple-positive breast cancer and the presence of brain metastases. Finally, we highlight promising novel treatments and ongoing trials that may impact future treatment sequencing.

Rational design of novel microtubule targeting anticancer drugs N-imidazopyridine noscapinoids: Chemical synthesis and experimental evaluation based on in vitro using breast cancer cells and in vivo using xenograft mice model

We present N-imidazopyridine-noscapinoids, a new class of noscapine derivatives that bind to tubulin and exhibit antiproliferative activity against triple positive (MCF-7) and triple negative (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cells. The N-atom of the isoquinoline ring of noscapine scaffold was altered in silico by coupling the imidazo [(Ye et al., 1998; Ke et al., 2000) 1,21,2-a] pyridine pharmacophore to rationally develop a series of N-imidazopyridine-noscapinoids (7–11) with high tubulin binding affinity. The predicted ΔGbinding of the N-imidazopyridine-noscapinoids 7–11 varied from −27.45 to −36.15 kcal/mol, a much lower value than noscapine with ΔGbinding −22.49 kcal/mol. The cytotoxicity of N-imidazopyridine-noscapinoids was evaluated using hormone dependent MCF-7, triple negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines and primary breast cancer cells. The cytotoxicity of these compounds (represented as IC50 concentration) ranges between 4.04 and 33.93 μM against breast cancer cells without affecting normal cells (IC50 value > 952 μM). All the compounds (7–11) perturbed the cell cycle progression at G2/M phase and triggered apoptosis. Among all the N-imidazopyridine-noscapinoids, N-5-Bromoimidazopyridine-noscapine (9) showed promising antiproliferative activity and was selected for detailed investigation. The onset of apoptosis treated with 9 using MDA-MB-231 revealed morphological changes like cellular shrinkage, chromatin condensation, membrane blebbing, and apoptotic bodies formation. Along with elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS), there was a loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, suggesting induction of apoptosis to cancer cells. Compound 9 was also found to significantly regress the implanted tumour in nude mice as xenografts of MCF-7 cells without any apparent side effects after drug administration. We conclude that N-imidazopyridine-noscapinoids possess excellent potential as a promising drug for treating breast cancers.

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus trastuzumab, dalpiciclib, and letrozole for triple-positive breast cancer: A pilot trial.

e12603 Background: Our previous MUKDEN 01 study showed a promising total pathological complete response (tpCR) rate of 30.4% with neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus dalpiciclib (cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) and letrozole in patients with triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC), but the efficacy still needs improvement. This pilot study explored the efficacy and safety of adding trastuzumab to this neoadjuvant regimen in TPBC. Methods: Patients received five 28-day cycles of pyrotinib (320 mg once daily), dalpiciclib (125 mg once daily on days 1-21) and letrozole (2.5 mg once daily), plus six 21-day cycles of trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg maintenance dose on day 1), followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was tpCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) rate. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), breast pathological complete response (bpCR; ypT0/is) rate, residual cancer burden (RCB), change in Ki-67 level from baseline to surgery, and safety. Results: Between February 16, 2022 and June 2, 2022, 12 patients were enrolled. Seven (58%; 95% CI, 27.7-84.8) patients achieved tpCR and bpCR. The rate of RCB 0-I was 75% (95% CI, 46.8-91.1%). ORR was 92% (95% CI, 64.6-98.5%). Mean Ki-67 level was significantly reduced from 45.0% (95% CI, 19.5% - 70.5%) at baseline to 17.2% (95% CI, 0.7% - 33.7%) after neoadjuvant therapy (P&lt;0.05). The most common grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (4 [33%]) and decreased neutrophil count (3 [25%]). No grade 4 events or treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This four-drug neoadjuvant regimen shows promising pathological response in patients with TPBC, with an acceptable safety profile. The results warranted further validation. Clinical trial information: NCT05228951 .

Impact of geography on receipt of medical oncology consultation and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative and HER2 positive breast cancer.

1530 Background: Consensus guidelines recommend consideration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for most patients with early-stage triple negative (TN) and HER2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Based on our previous work, most patients are not seen by a medical oncologist prior to surgery and do not receive NAC. Although potential barriers are not well understood, distance to cancer centres has been shown to mediate medical oncology referral and use of systemic therapy for other malignancies. We therefore aimed to characterize the impact of region of residence and cancer centre proximity on receipt of pre-treatment medical oncology consultation and NAC for patients with TN and HER2+ breast cancer. Methods: Using linked administrative healthcare datasets in Ontario, Canada, we performed a retrospective population-based geographic analysis of women diagnosed with stage I-III TN or HER2+ breast cancer from 2012-2019. Outcomes were pre-treatment medical oncology consultation and initiation of NAC. We created choropleth maps to assess the spatial distribution of outcomes across census divisions, displaying cancer centres and outcomes by colour gradient using geographic information system analysis. To assess the relationship between distance to the nearest cancer centre and outcomes, we performed a multivariable regression analysis adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors, including tumour extent and nodal status. Results: Within the cohort of 12,881 patients, there was no statistically significant relationship between incremental distance to the nearest cancer centre (≤5 vs. 5-10, 10-25, and ≥25 km) and rate of medical oncology consultation or receipt of NAC. Mapping analysis demonstrated high interregional outcome variability, ranging across census divisions from 12.2% to 64.3% for medical oncology consultation rate, and 9.3% to 64.3% for NAC rate. 77.7% of patients referred to medical oncology received NAC. Conclusions: Among patients with TN and HER2+ early breast cancer, rates of medical oncology consultation and NAC were not significantly impacted by distance to cancer centres but varied highly by region. This variability suggests that regional and/or provider practice patterns, rather than distance, may underlie discrepancies in referral for NAC. These findings can inform further studies and interventions aiming to improve equitable access to NAC for patients with TN and HER2+ breast cancer.